The
Moon landing conspiracy theories claim that some or all elements of the
Apollo program and the associated
Moon landings were hoaxes staged by
NASA
and members of other organizations. Various groups and individuals have
made such conspiracy claims since the mid-1970s. The most notable claim
is that the
six manned landings (1969–1972) were faked and that the
twelve Apollo astronauts did not walk on the Moon. Conspiracy theorists (henceforth
conspiracists)
base their claims on the notion NASA and others knowingly misled the
public into believing the landings happened by manufacturing,
destroying, or tampering with evidence; including photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions, rock samples, and even some key witnesses.
Conspiracists have managed to sustain public interest in their theories for more than 40 years despite there being much
third-party evidence for the landings and detailed rebuttals to the hoax claims.
Polls taken in various locations have shown that between 6% and 20% of
Americans surveyed believe that the manned landings were faked, rising
to 28% in Russia. Even as late as 2001, the major television network
Fox broadcast a documentary named
Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? claiming NASA faked the first landing in 1969 to win the
Space Race.
Since the late 2000s, high-definition photos taken by the
LROC spacecraft of the Apollo landing sites have captured the lander modules and the tracks left by the astronauts.
In 2012, images were released showing the Apollo flags still standing on the Moon.
Listed are a few controversial point
 |
Astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong in NASA's training mockup
of the Moon and lander module. Conspiracy theorists say that the film
of the missions was made using similar sets to this training mockup. |
 |
Jim Lovell training for Apollo 13 | | | | | | | | | |
The photos contain artifacts like the two seemingly matching 'C's on a
rock and on the ground. These may be labeled studio props.
The "C"-shaped objects are most likely printing imperfections and
do not appear in the original film from the camera. It has been
suggested that the "C" is a coiled hair
 |
Original AS16-107-17446 photograph |
 |
Close-up of later generation prints of 17446 | | |
There appear to be "hot spots" in some photos that look like a huge spotlight was used.
- Pits on the Moon's surface focus and reflect light like the tiny
glass spheres used in the coating of street signs, or dew-drops on wet
grass. This creates a glow around the photographer's own shadow when it
appears in a photograph .
- If the astronaut is standing in sunlight while photographing into
shade, light reflected off his white spacesuit yields a similar effect
to a spotlight.
- Some widely published Apollo photos were high-contrast copies.
Scans of the original transparencies are generally much more evenly lit.
An example is shown below:
 |
Original photo of Buzz Aldrin during Apollo 11 |
 |
The more famous edited version. The contrast has been tweaked (yielding
the "spotlight effect") and a black band has been pasted at the top |
Good one,,, Hope to see more "controversial" things on this page :P.
ReplyDeleteYes definitely Sanjay :)
Delete